- cross-posted to:
- fuck_ai@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- fuck_ai@lemmy.world
The paper said that after an AI tool was implemented at a large materials-science lab, researchers discovered significantly more materials—a result that suggested that, in certain settings, AI could substantially improve worker productivity. That paper, by Aidan Toner-Rodgers, was covered by The Wall Street Journal and other media outlets.
The paper was championed by MIT economists Daron Acemoglu, who won the 2024 economics Nobel, and David Autor.
In a press release, MIT said it “has no confidence in the provenance, reliability or validity of the data and has no confidence in the veracity of the research contained in the paper.”
The university said the author of the paper is no longer at MIT.
You could boil these material scientist’s jobs down to two things: discovering materials and documenting them. If AI takes over the documentation, then that leaves more time to discover.
Only if they don’t spend more time reviewing and fixing errors in the generated documentation than they would have just writing it in the first place.
Of course AI won’t take over documentation. It turns out that precise and good communication works better if you understand what you’re writing about.
“If AI does the menial jobs, that leaves more time for humans to pursue the arts!”
Reality: LLMs creating AI slop and putting artists out of work.
I wouldn’t be too hopeful that the humans get to do the enjoyable work.