All these pushes to keep Hillary relevant is so tone deaf. Waiting for the day some doofus tries to tell me why we can’t find better representation from the 350,000,000 people in the united states.
So we can’t just appreciate the meaning of the words because she’s someone you don’t like? She didn’t end her post with “and that’s why you should vote for me in 2028”, she’s simply stating a fact.
Tell me you didn’t vote for Kamala because she was a woman without telling me you didn’t vote for Kamala because she was a woman harder.
More because she is deeply corrupt and her accusing Trump of corruption, while true, is not aimed at reducing corruption. It is done to distract from her corruption.
“I refuse to acknowledge the veracity of knowledge because it came out of someone I dislikes mouth” is some real mouth breather shit. Go back to Reddit loser.
Just because I don’t disagree with her on literally every issue doesn’t mean that her words worth my time either.
I’m sure JK Rowling and I agree on something, but I still want her to keep all of her opinions to herself, not just her problematic ones. Because she has a hard time telling the difference.
Ah yes the sound logic of blaming everyone in a country for the actions of that country.
Applying that line of thinking to WWII Germany would mean the victims of the Holocaust were to blame for the holocaust.
As that would be an offensive and moronic line if thinking I think it us safe to reject it in both cases.
No moron, we’re at the “words coming out of the mouth of someone you dont like doesn’t automatically make them false”, did you pay attention in kindergarten?
All these pushes to keep Hillary relevant is so tone deaf. Waiting for the day some doofus tries to tell me why we can’t find better representation from the 350,000,000 people in the united states.
I don’t see her running for 2028… where are you even seeing this?
Sorry, did I say that?
Who’s pushing her? She posted on Bluesky and it’s being shared. There’s no conspiracy here.
Why aren’t they sharing my post from bluesky?
No one is trying to make her politically viable.
Just like during her campaign
AY-YO 🙏 self-five
Who are these people coming out in defense of Hilary in 2025?
The people who aren’t so ignorant to think she is trying for office in 2028.
I said nothing about running her for office.
That was the impression I got from what you wrote as well. Could you try saying it another way? Because it seems some of us aren’t getting it.
Why do people want to keep Hilary relevant?
Right. I think a lot of people wonder about that. But you seemed to be driving at a point. Specifically this bit:
What did you mean by this if you weren’t implying she was going to run again?
Representation, meaning, someone who represents your ideas.
So we can’t just appreciate the meaning of the words because she’s someone you don’t like? She didn’t end her post with “and that’s why you should vote for me in 2028”, she’s simply stating a fact.
Tell me you didn’t vote for Kamala because she was a woman without telling me you didn’t vote for Kamala because she was a woman harder.
More because she is deeply corrupt and her accusing Trump of corruption, while true, is not aimed at reducing corruption. It is done to distract from her corruption.
They allow Fox News viewers in here? Fucking yuck. Go back to Reddit brown shirt.
And you’re apparently unaware of the Clinton foundation and the UAE.
Go read some history books.
Weak, try harder
Never gonna “appreciate” genocidal imperialists.
And no, gender doesn’t make it ok.
“I refuse to acknowledge the veracity of knowledge because it came out of someone I dislikes mouth” is some real mouth breather shit. Go back to Reddit loser.
Just because I don’t disagree with her on literally every issue doesn’t mean that her words worth my time either.
I’m sure JK Rowling and I agree on something, but I still want her to keep all of her opinions to herself, not just her problematic ones. Because she has a hard time telling the difference.
I don’t want to hear anything from a hypocrite.
Then die stupid.
No, u
Ah yes the sound logic of blaming everyone in a country for the actions of that country.
Applying that line of thinking to WWII Germany would mean the victims of the Holocaust were to blame for the holocaust. As that would be an offensive and moronic line if thinking I think it us safe to reject it in both cases.
You’re spreading Propaganda Meanwhile trump is sending to death camps,.
Yea, you aren’t just sexist. You’re all the bigotry that is trump now.
Lol, we’re back to “any criticism of Hillary Clinton is sexism”? I could’ve sworn it wasn’t 2016 anymore.
I mean, it’s not like centrists have changed for the better since then.
No moron, we’re at the “words coming out of the mouth of someone you dont like doesn’t automatically make them false”, did you pay attention in kindergarten?
350,000,000 people in the US, all saying things that can be appreciated.
Cool?
Sorry, I said words. I know how that might upset you.
Shhh, go away.
~oh kay im leaving~