db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comcakeM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 28 days agoPSAlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up194arrow-down163cross-posted to: politicalmemes@scribe.disroot.org
arrow-up131arrow-down1imagePSAlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comcakeM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 28 days agomessage-square29fedilinkcross-posted to: politicalmemes@scribe.disroot.org
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down8·27 days agothis isn’t about accelerationism
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)linkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·27 days agoAnti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·27 days ago Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism you’re making that up
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down5·edit-227 days agostating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
this isn’t about accelerationism
Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
you’re making that up
stating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism