db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 month agoPSAlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up197arrow-down164cross-posted to: politicalmemes@scribe.disroot.org
arrow-up133arrow-down1imagePSAlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 month agomessage-square29fedilinkcross-posted to: politicalmemes@scribe.disroot.org
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down8·1 month agothis isn’t about accelerationism
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·1 month agoAnti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down4·1 month ago Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism you’re making that up
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down5·edit-21 month agostating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
this isn’t about accelerationism
Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
you’re making that up
stating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism