An international team of investigative journalists has looked into how China silences its critics living abroad. Direkt36 traced the head of an organization based in Hungary, who has also been in contact with high-ranking Hungarian government politicians. A tense situation unfolded at the United Nations Conference on Human Rights in February 2023. In the elegant Wilson Palace conference room in Geneva, UN representatives reviewed a report on China, which also addressed the oppression of the Uyghur and Tibetan minorities.
Hmmmmmmm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Endowment_for_Democracy
On a scale of 1 to 10, how happy are you that Trump’s fascist regime has taken out USAID following the Project 2025 plan?
If it means less fascist violence spread in the interests of US hegemony, then who am I to complain. Maybe you should consider that being the running dogs of the US is not a long term self-serving strategy. It would be in the best interests of Europe to understand this truth deeply. Or just carry water for the capitalist-to-fascist status quo against anyone that opposes it. What happened last time again?
https://www.hamptonthink.org/read/the-dark-side-of-usaid
It doesn’t. It just means that the US turning into a more openly fascist empire who will sponsor other fascist governments around the world, more openly.
So is funding anti China propaganda more fascist or less fascist in your mind?
Interesting that you call the article propaganda. Which bit specifically do you object to? Is it all exaggerated in your opinion?
Being an explicitly US funded org with a clearly pro-NATO bias is plenty for me. The contents of the article are mostly in the realm of ‘shadowy connections’ with paraphrased testimony of one clearly pro-US Chinese person. No evidence provided beside “take our word for it” alongside hearsay and ancedotes. This is not what I consider ‘investigative reporting’ by a long shot. If you look through the headlines on the site, it is very clear they have an agenda to push.
In 2023 alone, USAID provided assistance to 130 countries, disbursing $71.9 billion in foreign aid – the majority of which was spent on economic development (27 per cent), followed by health (22.3 per cent) and humanitarian assistance (21.7 per cent) to other nations.
Between 2017 and 2020, USAID responded to more than 240 natural disasters and crises around the world – from famines in the Republic of South Sudan to conflict in Afghanistan, Yemen and the Lake Chad basin.
From 2012 to 2017, it supported more than five million survivors of gender-based violence through services including medical care, counselling and legal help. Such care is vital considering that one in three women will experience gender-based violence in their lifetime.
And in 2016 alone, the organisation provided food assistance to more than 53 million people across 47 countries.
https://geographical.co.uk/news/usaid-the-successful-projects-that-changed-lives-around-the-world
https://web.archive.org/web/20201001161549/https://2012-2017.usaid.gov/reports-and-data/key-accomplishments
@culprit@lemmy.ml
The expected whataboutism.
Sorry but how is this whataboutism? It’s looking into the source for the information in the article