That’s why I’ll never support it in the arts at any level. The most important part of creativity, the central feature that makes it human and worthwhile as a product, is what you don’t put on the canvas. Decades of learning from mistakes and different lived/absorbed influences makes your work good. You need to fail and then self-reflect on that failure to grow, just as anything else in life. Using AI as a timesaving crutch completely annihilates that learning process.
You’re not spending hours or days or years redrafting something until it actually reflects everything you want to communicate after learning from your own work. You’re not identifying your weaknesses and addressing them with practice. You aren’t stewing on it for a year while you read three other books that would greatly improve the one you’re writing with issues you never thought about. AI lets you instantly shit out whatever you impulsively feel or want in the moment. If you spend that year reprompting it instead of consciously working through a problem, you don’t learn anything from that and only further rely on the hallucinated word diarrhoea of redditors to form your worldview. Whatever model you use to think for you, a better one will make a better product for free and I have zero incentive to bother with yours.
AI exists to bankrupt tech demons by saying “thank you” to ChatGPT after using it to cheat on homework.
Yeah, but have you considered that typing “pretty landscape picture” generates just as much value as an artist who put their heart and soul into a piece? Of course you haven’t, souls don’t exist, love is just a chemical reaction in the brain, nothing matters, you can’t determine what is and isn’t real, this is probably all just a simulation therefore you are an AI, (not me though, because I am enlightened by my own intelligence).
That’s why I’ll never support it in the arts at any level. The most important part of creativity, the central feature that makes it human and worthwhile as a product, is what you don’t put on the canvas. Decades of learning from mistakes and different lived/absorbed influences makes your work good. You need to fail and then self-reflect on that failure to grow, just as anything else in life. Using AI as a timesaving crutch completely annihilates that learning process.
You’re not spending hours or days or years redrafting something until it actually reflects everything you want to communicate after learning from your own work. You’re not identifying your weaknesses and addressing them with practice. You aren’t stewing on it for a year while you read three other books that would greatly improve the one you’re writing with issues you never thought about. AI lets you instantly shit out whatever you impulsively feel or want in the moment. If you spend that year reprompting it instead of consciously working through a problem, you don’t learn anything from that and only further rely on the hallucinated word diarrhoea of redditors to form your worldview. Whatever model you use to think for you, a better one will make a better product for free and I have zero incentive to bother with yours.
AI exists to bankrupt tech demons by saying “thank you” to ChatGPT after using it to cheat on homework.
Yeah, but have you considered that typing “pretty landscape picture” generates just as much value as an artist who put their heart and soul into a piece? Of course you haven’t, souls don’t exist, love is just a chemical reaction in the brain, nothing matters, you can’t determine what is and isn’t real, this is probably all just a simulation therefore you are an AI, (not me though, because I am enlightened by my own intelligence).