• freagle@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    21 days ago

    Theory: just like in Ukraine, part of the goal is to draw out military capabilities and see how they perform. Russia did everything it could to limit advanced tech deployment in the beginning of the SMO to avoid showing all its cards, but the US still gained valuable Intel on Russian capabilities. If my theory is correct that this flare up is being directed by the US, it could be partially to get Intel on the field performance of Chinese weapon systems.

    • CommCat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      France would not allow their best fighter jet to get shot down by China’s mid range fighter jets, just so Uncle Sam could get some information on Chinese military hardware. It’s a major blow to the reputation of Dassault (Rafale Manufacturer). Western military tech sales are hyped up because of their real world success on the battlefield, but they’ve always been picking on weaker armies.

      • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        21 days ago

        Would France have any power here? The issue is whether or not India attacks Pakistan. What happens afterward is all data. My conjecture is the US has a vested interest in India attacking Pakistan, that this flare up was engineered by the US, and I am trying to understand what the US gains from it as a way of analyzing my hypothesis

        • Eiren (she/her)@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          21 days ago

          Intel may be part of it, but I suspect thoy wanted to try to force conflict between China and India + thoroughly corner another Muslim country, if possible.

          I suspect they had little belief Chinese tech would be on an entirely different, superior level to western tech, or they considered it a relatively unlikely worst case scenario.

          • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            21 days ago

            I agree that the intelligence angle is only part of it. The chaos of war creates a lot of opportunities. Additionally, it can potentially shore up domestic support for Modi as a “war-time” leader, create some pretext for Indian arms mobilization, create some pretext for US “peacekeeping” forces to be deployed, etc.

            I think this conflict can do a lot for the US project, which is why I think the US may be behind it.

      • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        21 days ago

        I didn’t think China would be pushing for a conflagration to test their systems though

    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      21 days ago

      Indeed!

      but the US still gained valuable Intel on Russian capabilities

      The logistics of war being the one aspect they couldn’t hide, or intentionally had several severe fuckups.