“How hard they work to define the slave as inhuman, savage, when in fact the definition of the inhuman describes overwhelmingly the punisher. When they rest, exhausted, between bouts of lashing, the punishment is more sadistic than corrective. If sustained whipping tires the lasher, and he or she must take a series of breaks before continuing, what good does its duration do to the whipped? Such extreme pain seems to be designed for the pleasure of the one with the lash. The necessity of rendering the slave a foreign species appears to be a desperate attempt to confirm one’s own self as normal. The urgency of distinguishing between those who belong to the human race and those who are decidedly non-human is so powerful the spotlight turns away and shines not on the object of degradation but on its creator. Even assuming exaggeration by the slaves, the sensibility of slave owners is gothic. It’s as though they are shouting, “I am not a beast! I’m not a beast! I torture the helpless to prove I am not weak.” The danger of sympathizing with the stranger is the possibility of becoming a stranger. To lose one’s racial-ized rank is to lose one’s own valued and enshrined difference.” ― Toni Morrison, The Origin of Others

  • RoundSparrow @ .ee@lemm.eeOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Blocked

    “Mocks your postings on Lemmy, then blocks you when you call out their mocking” - information warfare strategy. I call it “Mock you, Block You”.

    Very common bait tactic, to come in with noise and pro-Russian behavior when you post about Kremlin information warfare.

    The first “mock you” comment in the message posting was:

    “Tell us about the timecube, please.”

    They waste a bunch of my time with insults and mocking, then declare “I’m blocking you”. This is the information warfare pattern of behavior.

     

    ::: ___________
    Russia-watcher Catherine Fitzpatrick, who documents Kremlin disinformation for InterpreterMag . com, says just as Moscow uses vague Internet laws to encourage self-censorship, trolls inhibit informed debate by using crude dialogue to change “the climate of discussion.” “If you show up at The Washington Post or New Republic sites, where there’s an article that’s critical of Russia, and you see that there are 200 comments that sound like they were written by 12-year-olds, then you just don’t bother to comment,” she says. “You don’t participate. It’s a way of just driving discussion away completely,” she adds. “Those kinds of tactics are meant to stop democratic debate, and they work.” - The Atlantic, The Kremlin’s Troll Army. Moscow is financing legions of pro-Russia Internet commenters. Daisy Sindelar. August 12, 2014