I have no idea why this is a thing, but it’s come to my attention that there are several accounts here that are engaging in vote manipulation. This is fair warning that if it continues, I’ll be suspending the accounts involved.

  • solarvector@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Why not immediate ban instead of fair warning? Fair warning is more for a mistake in good faith, vote manipulation is kinda the opposite by definition.

      • jerry@infosec.pubOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I have messaged them directly. At least the ones I am aware of. This is a warning to others that I may not be aware of or people who decide to try it in the future.

  • RedFox@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Can anyone explain why people care about votes on Lemmy? Isnt it like winning a contest no one’s play, or am I missing something?

    • activistPnk@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Down votes have a suppressive effect. Views and engagement drop when the votes are <1. The initial votes are important because they influence the votes that follow. My Tyranny of voting thread gives some detail.

  • activistPnk@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Seems like it could be a non-stop game of whack-a-mole. Even if you ban accounts they can just create more. If you do a good job of the baby sitting, they can use even more accounts to mask patterns. I don’t see how an admin can prevail.

    Disabling down votes would prevent the practice of down voting to suppress. But probably the most effective is to disable voting entirely.