• Smorty [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    yea… ive had thad many times… peeps jus yap a thing, of which i think i saw the thumbnail to (bt didn watch it), then say “yeayea i watched thad video too” n they feel dum for takin YouTube as a credible source >v<

    • owl_herd@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      14 hours ago

      youtube can very much be a credible source. its certainly not all youtube, but that can be said about anything including teachers an# any book. it is true youtube may have numerally more uncredible stuff but that maybe due to its sheer size as a platform and ease of spam

      • Smorty [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        yeayea i kno… bt the thingsises my brothr wathces r usualli kinda bs… jus lik… som clearli gamer youtubr guy sayin a thing in a short (which r apparentli tiktok for youtbe…)

        • owl_herd@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          thats fair, i do understand the problem. but i think in a public-esq forum, having generalizations could be bad. that is a personal belief that i dont want to impose on others, im fine with giving that take (hopefully without hostility) under others in good faith

      • owl_herd@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        using youtube video generalizations can be bad as it is a leading video hub. and implying its bad may lead to bad vids taking youtube more as their home while those that do put effort and work to be more reliable feeling unwelcomed