• pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t understand why people are talking so much about a has-been studio’s remaster of its worst entry to the series. anything to avoid making tes6 I guess.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        I meant keeping people busy with old games so they don’t ask about the next one but yeah of course it’s better than bgs handling anything.

    • drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I’d call you a killjoy, but I’m still having a lot of fun with it, so you obviously didn’t succeed. I guess you’re just boring then.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        not as boring as tes4 but yeah never said I was exciting. weirdly defensive by the way, I don’t know what’s supposed to be “succeeding” here: you either agree and aren’t playing, or disagree and are playing.

          • pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            yeah it’s called having an opinion. idk why gamers can’t handle it. death threats for 7/10 reviews and shit. you can just move on without getting personally offended.

            I understand making a case for something you enjoy for people who don’t, maybe give people a perspective they might have not considered. but notice how neither of you gave any reason why tes4 isn’t the worst in the series. because it is.

            it has Patrick Stewart though so that’s not a claim a lot of games can make.