• vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    slash inference costs by doing a bunch of useless inferences in the hope that the one the user actually wanted happened to be one of them.

    It cannot be more efficient than just waiting for the input and inferring once based on that.

    • jwmgregory@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      i mean…

      your brain essentially does this it’s just that compute and memory are one system and it is as physically optimized as possible in brain systems.

      this strategy is less stupid than it sounds if you abandon von neumann purism imo

      it can be more efficient than just waiting for the input and inferring once based on that… you are an example of this in real life.

      • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        faster != more efficient. And you cannot compare brains to computers. Speculative execution improves speed in the cpu, at the cost of efficiency