RNAi [he/him]@hexbear.net to Slop.@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 months agoMATHhexbear.netimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1140arrow-down10
arrow-up1140arrow-down1imageMATHhexbear.netRNAi [he/him]@hexbear.net to Slop.@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-square7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months ago where you have 9/10 and 11/10 respectively This is the one that is not intuitive
minus-squareaebletrae [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoHow are you at thinking about years, decades, and centuries? If we take it step by step:— 10 years of a century is ten years out of a hundred. 10% is ten out of a hundred. So 10 years is 10% of a century. Looking at the same thing another way:— 10 years is a also a decade. There are 10 decades in a century. So one decade is one tenth (1/10) of a century. Bringing in the comparison from earlier:— 90% of a century is 90 years, or 9 decades. 9 decades is nine tenths (9/10) of a century. 110% of a century is 110 years, or 11 decades. 11 decades is eleven tenths (11/10) of a century. Are these familiar enough to make sense as a parallel, or just further irrelevant confusion?
minus-square7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months ago How are you at thinking about years, decades, and centuries? not a lot, usually It’s not like I don’t get the train of thought here, it just doesn’t come intuitive
This is the one that is not intuitive
How are you at thinking about years, decades, and centuries?
If we take it step by step:—
Looking at the same thing another way:—
Bringing in the comparison from earlier:—
Are these familiar enough to make sense as a parallel, or just further irrelevant confusion?
not a lot, usually
It’s not like I don’t get the train of thought here, it just doesn’t come intuitive