I replied to your dumbass comment about North Korea, but sure. China is communist because the state, controlled by the communist party, retains control of the markets and businesses. This is a stage of development on the road to full state communism which has allowed China to avoid the mistakes the Soviets made in opposition to the West. Deng correctly assessed that western capitalists, lacking central control or the ability to plan long term due to their economic model, would leap at the chance to offshore their production to China. Now the west no longer has any productive capacity to speak of and China is the productive center of the planet, meaning western plots to destabilize or coup China are impossible without massive shocks to the global system.
Ask our Chinese users, cracker, but please go on about how the collapsing American military dictatorship that primarily exists as an incel torment nexus for women is a better place to live than a sleepy co-op across the border from Liaoning
I don’t think there is a single Marxist, as it would be anathema, who claims that capitalism doesn’t “pave the road” for socialism and the development of communism. There is some debate to be had about when to stop allowing capitalism to exist as a mode of production.
So, whatever you are implying here, is just drivel.
on what matter? dumb shit you said? why do you think you should be taken seriously?
here’s an actual opinion: you seem ignorant
Your opinion on why you think China is purely communist and my assessment that it’s largely capitalist is wrong. Can’t you follow the thread?
I replied to your dumbass comment about North Korea, but sure. China is communist because the state, controlled by the communist party, retains control of the markets and businesses. This is a stage of development on the road to full state communism which has allowed China to avoid the mistakes the Soviets made in opposition to the West. Deng correctly assessed that western capitalists, lacking central control or the ability to plan long term due to their economic model, would leap at the chance to offshore their production to China. Now the west no longer has any productive capacity to speak of and China is the productive center of the planet, meaning western plots to destabilize or coup China are impossible without massive shocks to the global system.
You’re also a dipshit.
So you agree that China has incorporated aspects of capitalism, good. Thanks for confirming what I already said.
Do you really think the DPRK is democratic? Wild 🤣
Still conflating markets and capitalism like someone that would fail a civics class in any socialist country
Please describe what kind of economic environment that an economy exclusively consisting of worker-owned co-ops and trade unions be competing in
No dummy, I said China is doing communism with Chinese characteristics, do not try to twist my words.
Glad you came back to reply after being heckled for pretending that nobody had given you a real response. Sorry your response is so pathetic.
Tell me what you know about the DPRK’s electoral process. Do it without looking it up.
You’re posting away all over the place but still haven’t provided any details about DPRK elections, it’s almost like you might not know about them.
Stop desperately trying to walk back your claim:
Ask our Chinese users, cracker, but please go on about how the collapsing American military dictatorship that primarily exists as an incel torment nexus for women is a better place to live than a sleepy co-op across the border from Liaoning
deleted by creator
I’ve already read that dude 😂. And it says what I’ve already said, China uses tools of capitalism in its system since at least the 1970s.
You should spend more time researching and less time trying to dig up dirt on people.
Please describe what kind of economic environment that an economy exclusively consisting of worker-owned co-ops and trade unions be competing in
I don’t think there is a single Marxist, as it would be anathema, who claims that capitalism doesn’t “pave the road” for socialism and the development of communism. There is some debate to be had about when to stop allowing capitalism to exist as a mode of production.
So, whatever you are implying here, is just drivel.