Occam’s razor still applies. Your alternative explanations require additional and sometimes obscure factors, whereas the direct experience of the Uncommitted folks (actual Democrats! With previous Democratic campaign experience!) already gives an explanation that hasn’t been shot down by Harris campaign insiders either.
But let’s use the device as a tool for thought rather than an Oracle
In doing so, let’s examine the counterfactual: do you think the Harris campaign likely was privy to knowledge that we are not and which isn’t shared? I absolutely do
Occam’s razor still applies. Your alternative explanations require additional and sometimes obscure factors, whereas the direct experience of the Uncommitted folks (actual Democrats! With previous Democratic campaign experience!) already gives an explanation that hasn’t been shot down by Harris campaign insiders either.
Can you tell me what you think the confounding factors are?
For example, you’re assuming the Harris campaign knew something we don’t. That’s adding extra variables.
Cool I think that applies
But let’s use the device as a tool for thought rather than an Oracle
In doing so, let’s examine the counterfactual: do you think the Harris campaign likely was privy to knowledge that we are not and which isn’t shared? I absolutely do