itsnicodegallo@lemm.ee to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agoThis post is the ”_____”lemm.eeimagemessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up1420arrow-down111
arrow-up1409arrow-down1imageThis post is the ”_____”lemm.eeitsnicodegallo@lemm.ee to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square59fedilink
minus-squareFleetingTit@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31arrow-down5·5 months agoBoth sexes can have or lack tits. So the first one is okay, the second one is sexist.
minus-squarechonglibloodsport@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30·5 months agoWho said anything about sex? I’d rather read an essay comparing these:
minus-squareRiskable@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 months agoJust keep these fellas out of it:
minus-squarechonglibloodsport@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 months agoThey’ll eat all the nuts for sure!
minus-squareI'll be on ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down4·edit-25 months agoIn the same way people of all genders can have tits, so can people of all genders have nuts, so if that’s your reasoning, either both are sexist, or neither are.
minus-squareFleetingTit@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down4·5 months agoIf you read my comment carefully you will notice that I was talking about Sex, not Gender.
minus-squareelidoz@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·5 months agoovaries are just nuts in the inside
minus-squareRiskable@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 months agoI Snickers at this comment.
minus-squarePumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·5 months agoColloquial “sexism” is heavily based on gender, so if you want to be precise you should probably use another phrase entirely
minus-squareI'll be on ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down5·edit-25 months agoAnd if you knew anything about either, you’d know that both are a spectrum, so your argument is still invalid https://scatter.wordpress.com/2022/01/30/sex-as-a-social-construct/ https://www.nature.com/articles/518288a
minus-squareTriflingToad@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 months agoyo this debate is the tits 🔥🔥
Both sexes can have or lack tits. So the first one is okay, the second one is sexist.
Who said anything about sex? I’d rather read an essay comparing these:
Just keep these fellas out of it:
They’ll eat all the nuts for sure!
In the same way people of all genders can have tits, so can people of all genders have nuts, so if that’s your reasoning, either both are sexist, or neither are.
If you read my comment carefully you will notice that I was talking about Sex, not Gender.
ovaries are just nuts in the inside
I Snickers at this comment.
Colloquial “sexism” is heavily based on gender, so if you want to be precise you should probably use another phrase entirely
And if you knew anything about either, you’d know that both are a spectrum, so your argument is still invalid
https://scatter.wordpress.com/2022/01/30/sex-as-a-social-construct/
https://www.nature.com/articles/518288a
yo this debate is the tits 🔥🔥
Yes.