SDF Chatter
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Sine_Fine_Belli@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.ml · 6 months ago

Nuclear Power Was Once Shunned at Climate Talks. Now, It’s a Rising Star.

www.nytimes.com

external-link
message-square
58
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • world@lemmy.world
133
external-link

Nuclear Power Was Once Shunned at Climate Talks. Now, It’s a Rising Star.

www.nytimes.com

Sine_Fine_Belli@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.ml · 6 months ago
message-square
58
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • world@lemmy.world
  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Those 800 wind turbines can be built in a month. Building a nuclear plant takes decades. And nuclear fuel reprocessing had never been economical by a long shot. Your pipe dreams will always regain just that and that’s before we even start talking about proliferation and nuclear waste.

    • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Building a nuclear plant takes decades.

      In China they do it in 6 years…

      https://www.statista.com/statistics/712841/median-construction-time-for-reactors-since-1981/

      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        And in those 6 years, you could have built over 6x that capacity in renewables, easy.

        • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          You can also built more than 1 reactor at the same time

          • 418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            The same can be said of any power source?

            • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Sure, but the other commenter conveniently forgot that that’s the case for nuclear as well

          • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            You could, but with that colossal amount of resources you could have built 12x in renewables, probably more because of economy of scale.

            And if you decide to commit all those resources to renewables, you probably just created a booming local industry of well paying jobs.

            • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              But then you still haven’t solved any of the issues with renewables (at least solar and wind); The amount of space they take up, their inconsistent power output and power grids which haven’t been designed for them.

              • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                It saddens me that we’re here dealing with a push for obsolete, untenable solutions, and all the while, China keeps solving your “impossible issues” on the daily:

                https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20241113-will-chinas-ultra-high-voltage-grid-pay-off-for-renewable-power

                • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  That’s what happens when not everything is privatised and only made for direct profit, I suppose

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m very glad I don’t live anywhere near one of those.

        • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          And why is that?

          • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            6 months ago

            The Chinese are really famous for their safety culture, right?

            • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              6 months ago

              None of their reactors have blown up yet and they’ve had nuclear plants since the 50’s

World News@lemmy.ml

worldnews@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !worldnews@lemmy.ml

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 669 users / day
  • 1.94K users / week
  • 4.92K users / month
  • 13.4K users / 6 months
  • 379 local subscribers
  • 35.8K subscribers
  • 14.3K Posts
  • 140K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ml
  • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
  • Jack.@lemmy.ml
  • zephyreks@lemmy.ml
  • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.8
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org