SDF Chatter
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Yuritopiaposadism [none/use name]@hexbear.net to The Dredge Tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 8 months ago

THEY ARE LITERALLY TWO IDENTITIES IN ONE BODY WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE

hexbear.net

message-square
32
fedilink
94

THEY ARE LITERALLY TWO IDENTITIES IN ONE BODY WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE

hexbear.net

Yuritopiaposadism [none/use name]@hexbear.net to The Dredge Tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 8 months ago
message-square
32
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Cammy [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    8 months ago

    Their catchphrase is “We are Venom” they’re a plural entity. These fucking tourists.

    • UlyssesT@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        nerd This is the Sonyverse (idk if it has an official name, its movies Sony makes with Spiderman charachters that arent part of the MCU because Sony owns the rights) not the MCU technically speaking.

        Sorry autism.

        • UlyssesT@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          deleted by creator

        • Gaia [She/Her]@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          Soynyverse amirite

  • JoeByeThen [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s almost like these people aren’t arguing in good faith and are just trying to rile people up. thinkin-lenin

  • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m just wondering how they coped with the very obvious homoeroticism of these characters till this point.

    • NephewAlphaBravo [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      8 months ago

      Their media has shrunk their worldview to a set of keywords

      • UlyssesT@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        deleted by creator

    • Cammy [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      over-your-head

  • courier8377 [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    8 months ago

    Why isn’t it " 'til death do them part" ?

    • culpritus [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It’s a subject pronoun. English is weird. If the sentence was in normal order it would be something like “They do [not] part until death.” The “not” being implied in this common phrase. Basically “they do part” is the core subject|verb of the sentence.

      • courier8377 [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        8 months ago

        Was thinking of " 'til death do us part," it irks me that they aren’t paralleling that construction but it makes sense

        • Moonworm [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          It would be correct to use ‘we’ in that sentence.

          • courier8377 [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            8 months ago

            " 'Til death do us part" is a canned phrase at this point, archaic way of saying “[We will do x thing] until death separates us,” with death as the subject. I get that they are changing the subject but the formulation of the canned phrase is entrenched in my mind lol

          • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I think death is the subject and it’s actually the subject-verb agreement that’s wonky. It could be rephrased as “Until death parts us.” I’m not sure why it’s not “'Til death does us part.”

            (Edited to add thoughts/be less certain)

            • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              8 months ago

              No, it’s “We do not part until death”. You can tell because of word order that the entity enacting the parting is “we” because it comes right before “part”. You can also tell because it’s “part” and not “parts” while being in the simple present, so it must not have a third person singular subject, which “death” would be.

              “Until death” in both cases is a prepositional phrase tacked on in both cases, so it does not contain the subject.

              • courier8377 [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                8 months ago

                “[Something will happen] until death parts us” is always how I interpreted it, perhaps to make the pronoun work in my mind, but “death” would be the subject of the subordinate phrase in my interpretation. Ig it comes down to whether you see it as a subordinate clause or a prepositional phrase

              • MuinteoirSaoirse [she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Death is the subject in the phrase. It’s from a 16th century Anglican prayer book, The Book of Common Prayer, in which it was “till death us depart,” with death being that which would depart (separate) the people making the vow (“us”). However, something that was more common in the 16th century (and is rather more rare in English now though many common phrases still use it), is the subjunctive mood, in which conjugation of verbs has a different form (usually the bare form).

            • Moonworm [any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              I’m pretty sure it’s the same construction as culpritus said.

        • culpritus [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          English is pretty loose on the rules when doing poetry or this sort of cliche tweaking. I think it can be argued either way pretty well. The phrase is sort of a dangling thought that originally was part of a longer sentence, so it’s pretty fraught overall.

      • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        If you flip that logic with the familiar “Till death do us part” then it should, apparently, actually be “Till death do we part”, but it’s not.

      • gay_king_prince_charles [she/her, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        If you need a paragraph to explain why something is grammatically correct, that isn’t much of an improvement on being grammatically incorrect

        • culpritus [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          English do be like that. Maybe someone can write a proof of the incompleteness of languages or something.

    • glimmer_twin [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I swear it’s usually “til death they do part”

  • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 months ago

    “Til death do they part” is an inverted conditional sentence with a prepositional phrase at the beginning and the subject toward the end; it means they stay parted until death.

    “Til death do them part” is a sentence with the primary and auxiliary verbs spliced around the object; it means they are parted at death but implies that they are united until then.

    @courier8377@hexbear.net is right.

    • courier8377 [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      lets-fucking-go

  • doublepepperoni [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hims

  • 2Password2Remember [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    movies were overrated anyway

    marvel brain is a cancer on this earth

    Death to America

  • Beluga [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s actually a really good movie the ending made me cry a lot

  • comrade_pibb [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    these people are so fucking tedious

  • DragonBallZinn [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I wish tourists a very go back to watching golf or something and stop gentrifying geek culture.

  • SorosFootSoldier [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    Ask me about how I’m a giant moron.

  • jackmarxist [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Man I hate chuds but I’m not going to argue online about a marvel movie.

  • glimmer_twin [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Trans derangement syndrome

  • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    deleted by creator

  • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    deleted by creator

The Dredge Tank@hexbear.net

dredge_tank@hexbear.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !dredge_tank@hexbear.net
lock
Community locked: only moderators can create posts. You can still comment on posts.

The Dredge Tank. For posting all the low tier reactionary bullshit that you can’t post anywhere else. Got some bullshit from Reddit with 2 upvotes and want to share, post it here.

This community was created with the purpose that Rule 8 fans will just block it.

The rules are literally The Dunk Tank’s rules, just without rule 8.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 1 user / week
  • 3 users / month
  • 32 users / 6 months
  • 3 local subscribers
  • 312 subscribers
  • 531 Posts
  • 10.3K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • ButtBidet [he/him]@hexbear.net
  • SexUnderSocialism [she/her]@hexbear.net
    cake
  • CARCOSA [mirror/your pronouns]@hexbear.net
  • BE: 0.19.8
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org