David Gerard@awful.systemsM to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 2 年前Why wordfreq will not be updated - AI spamgithub.comexternal-linkmessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up164arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
arrow-up164arrow-down1external-linkWhy wordfreq will not be updated - AI spamgithub.comDavid Gerard@awful.systemsM to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 2 年前message-square15linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
minus-squareV0ldek@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 年前 but if this interests you at all, check it out. ye that’s how most normal people use the internet? what’s the alternative strategy, checking it out if it doesn’t interest you?
minus-squarefroztbyte@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 年前staring at it suspiciously with eyes narrowed, until it scampers
minus-squareUnseriousAcademic@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 年前To be fair I’ve spent an inordinate amount of time looking at stuff on the Internet that doesn’t interest me. Especially since my workplace moved their employee training online.
minus-squareSerinus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 年前The alternative is reading the headline and skipping the article. The punchline is in the title, yes, but the article is still worth reading. Maybe I didn’t phrase that well.
minus-squareDavid Gerard@awful.systemsOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 年前I try for clickbait that delivers
ye that’s how most normal people use the internet? what’s the alternative strategy, checking it out if it doesn’t interest you?
staring at it suspiciously with eyes narrowed, until it scampers
To be fair I’ve spent an inordinate amount of time looking at stuff on the Internet that doesn’t interest me. Especially since my workplace moved their employee training online.
The alternative is reading the headline and skipping the article.
The punchline is in the title, yes, but the article is still worth reading. Maybe I didn’t phrase that well.
I try for clickbait that delivers