• aleph@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Oh, so you’re saying that Russia illegally annexing Crimea in 2014 wasn’t an invasion of Ukraine?

      • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        78
        ·
        2 years ago

        You can always tell who the most ignorant libs are when they bring up Crimea lmao

        Crimea is not Ukrainian, it has always been a distinct cultural ethnic region and 97% of Crimeans voting for independence from Kiev should give you pause before you breathlessly insist they should remain beholden to a bunch of nazi banderites

        • aleph@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Crimeans wanting independence means they wanted to become part of the Russian empire again?

          • Tachanka [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            66
            ·
            2 years ago

            the Russian federation is a reactionary bourgeois state that is a hollowed out shell of its former USSR self, but I dislike the hyperbole that it is “the Russian Empire”. Russia Today is neither the Russian empire, nor the Soviet Union. If anything it is closer politically to what it would have been if the February revolution had continued and the October revolution never happened: A bourgeois state.

          • Redcat [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            63
            ·
            2 years ago

            a russian majority region would rather not be ethnically cleansed

            they join russia

            those people are pro russian empire traitors

            yea

      • emizeko [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        62
        ·
        2 years ago

        making it pretty obvious here that you have no idea who Victoria Nuland is and only started paying attention to any of this stuff in 2022

        • aleph@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Assuming that it was even legitimate to begin with, which is a big if, a popular vote doesn’t automatically legitimize relinquishing territory to a foreign nation.

          • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            56
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Assuming that it was even legitimate to begin with

            “Democracy is when the stupid foreigners vote how I think they should, otherwise it’s not legitimate”

            doesn’t automatically legitimize relinquishing territory to a foreign nation.

            If the people vote overwhelmingly to leave Ukraine, then that shows that Crimea isn’t Ukraine’s to relinquish or not. Liberals and abandoning democracy as soon as it becomes a rhetorical inconvenience for them, name a more iconic duo.

          • SuperNovaCouchGuy2 [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            48
            ·
            2 years ago

            a “popular vote” doesn’t automatically legitimize relinquishing territory to a foreign nation.

            Good you acknowledge that even the westoid cope for the Euromaidan coup is bullshit.

          • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            45
            ·
            2 years ago

            If your aim is to prevent war, what is your solution for when the vast majority of people in one country want to join another, and vote accordingly?

            • aleph@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              A complicated situation certainly, but whatever the answer is, it is not “collude with a neighbouring foreign nation, allow them to invade, and provoke a military conflict.”

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        In response to Ukraine illegally replacing the president in a legislative coup.

        Let’s not pretend like the law matters, m’kay?

      • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        2 years ago

        I know borders are sacred and inviolable, but Ukraine and Russia were part of the same country until fairly recently. It’s not weird that large populations of people would rather not be living under the rule of Ukrainian nationalists and decided to make some adjustments.