Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldBanned to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前Contributionlemmy.worldimagemessage-square39linkfedilinkarrow-up1247arrow-down153
arrow-up1194arrow-down1imageContributionlemmy.worldLinkerbaan@lemmy.worldBanned to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square39linkfedilink
minus-squareLinkerbaan@lemmy.worldBannedOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down21·edit-21 年前https://unwatch.org/ https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/un-watch/
minus-squareGetOffMyLan@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down1·1 年前That site seems heavily right biased and not very factual. What’s your point?
minus-squarePeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 年前What is the diffe between “factual reporting” and “credibility rating”?
minus-squareGetOffMyLan@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down7·1 年前Yeah because they don’t make stuff up. They just have a huge bias.
minus-squareLinkerbaan@lemmy.worldBannedOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down7·1 年前Except they literally make up false allegations about UNRWA and the UN.
https://unwatch.org/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/un-watch/
That site seems heavily right biased and not very factual. What’s your point?
What is the diffe between “factual reporting” and “credibility rating”?
Yeah because they don’t make stuff up. They just have a huge bias.
Except they literally make up false allegations about UNRWA and the UN.