𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 9 months agoNot Permittedlemmy.worldimagemessage-square75fedilinkarrow-up1775arrow-down114
arrow-up1761arrow-down1imageNot Permittedlemmy.world𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 9 months agomessage-square75fedilink
minus-squareAdmiral Patrick@dubvee.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·9 months agoNew instance rule added 😆
minus-squareAdmiral Patrick@dubvee.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·9 months agoThat’s like $600 worth of violations. lol
minus-squareAdmiral Patrick@dubvee.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·9 months agoThe $600 fine includes a discount since they were part of the same violation, lol (also, I replied without the post image visible; thought it said $300 fine).
minus-squarepoke@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·9 months agoOh, we have economies of scale. Excellent. We just need to fund one person to violate the rule a LOT. Why? I don’t know.
minus-squareAlolanYoda@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 months agoClearly because it’s cheaper than having a lot of people violating the rule a little. Think of all the savings!
minus-squareSippy Cup@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·9 months agoOh no. I don’t want to rub the comUwUnity the wrong way
New instance rule added 😆
NuWu instance RuWule?
That’s like $600 worth of violations. lol
What’s the fine for bad math?
The $600 fine includes a discount since they were part of the same violation, lol (also, I replied without the post image visible; thought it said $300 fine).
Oh, we have economies of scale. Excellent. We just need to fund one person to violate the rule a LOT.
Why? I don’t know.
I volunteer as tribUwUte
Clearly because it’s cheaper than having a lot of people violating the rule a little.
Think of all the savings!
Oh no. I don’t want to rub the comUwUnity the wrong way