SDF Chatter
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Espiritdescali@futurology.todayM to Futurology@futurology.todayEnglish · 1 年前

Louisiana Customers who save on electric bills could be forced to pay utility company for lost profits

lailluminator.com

external-link
message-square
13
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • futurology@futurology.today
  • energy@slrpnk.net
  • futurology@futurology.today
  • chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
  • usa@lemmy.ml
89
external-link

Louisiana Customers who save on electric bills could be forced to pay utility company for lost profits

lailluminator.com

Espiritdescali@futurology.todayM to Futurology@futurology.todayEnglish · 1 年前
message-square
13
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • futurology@futurology.today
  • energy@slrpnk.net
  • futurology@futurology.today
  • chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
  • usa@lemmy.ml
Customers who save on electric bills could be forced to pay utility company for lost profits • Louisiana Illuminator
lailluminator.com
external-link
Louisiana utility companies still want to charge customers for the costs of a new energy efficiency program and for the electricity no longer needed due to that program.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 年前

    To a limited extent I can understand charging folks something. On the offhand chance you need to use the grid for power (or heck, to put power into it.), the grid needs to be functional, which takes repairs and maintenance, which takes money. That said, forcing to pay for lost profits is ridiculous.

    • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 年前

      Yup.

      However, let me suggest a radical idea:

      Any service that has infrastructure requirements like this, such that there’s a mandatory “base fee” under the usage fee, should be nationalized, and the base fee paid be taxes. Every, and any, service. Water. Sewage. Electricity. Internet. Roads. Any basic need provided, that requires infrastructure that would incur a monthly maintenance fee. De-privatize it.

      This would be my litmus law for nationalizing services.

      • Stern@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 年前

        Natural monopoly is the term you’re looking for I believe, though I think you’re going a smidge further then the definition.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_monopoly

        • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 年前

          Works for me.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 年前

      I’d be more amenable to fees if the companies were actually forced to maintain their infrastructure and if the government wasn’t already giving them all big handouts. That comment about nationalizing all of them makes a bunch of sense to me.

  • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 年前

    We live in a corporatocracy.

  • RagingHungryPanda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 年前

    Ah, Louisiana, first you charge people $800 energy bills then you complain that you can’t make it more efficient. Capitalism is doing great.

  • mkwt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 年前

    Too many utilities are incorrectly billing fixed distribution costs on their per-kilowatt hour rate. Where I live, distribution is just over half the cost of electricity, but it is still mostly billed per kilowatt hour, when really those costs are nearly completely fixed.

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 年前

    Sounds about right for Louisiana.

  • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 年前

    Double repost:

    https://futurology.today/post/2001065

    https://futurology.today/post/2009533

    Not sure why this one has more comments than the previous ones.

    • voidx@futurology.todayM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 年前

      We had a technical issue that impacted the federation with other instances. It’s resolved now so there’s more visibility.

      • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 年前

        Ah, that would explain it. Thanks!

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 年前

    FREEDOM! Enjoy those PROFITS you SOCIALIST COMMIES IN BLUE STATES!

Futurology@futurology.today

futurology@futurology.today

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !futurology@futurology.today
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 21 users / day
  • 321 users / week
  • 1.25K users / month
  • 5.46K users / 6 months
  • 27 local subscribers
  • 3.27K subscribers
  • 2.04K Posts
  • 12.7K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • voidx@futurology.today
  • Lugh@futurology.today
  • Espiritdescali@futurology.today
  • AwesomeLowlander@futurology.today
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org