SDF Chatter
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works ·
edit-2
10 months ago

Donald emails

sh.itjust.works

message-square
68
fedilink
1.12K

Donald emails

sh.itjust.works

ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works ·
edit-2
10 months ago
message-square
68
fedilink

https://mstdn.social/@Strandjunker/112961684584733473

  • NJSpradlin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s wild. Any idea what media outlet specifically it was leaked to?

      • NJSpradlin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        10 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I wonder why it wasn’t sent to wikileaks?

          • Lemminary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            33
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            Isn’t Wikileaks Russian?

            • ramble81@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              34
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              So they were already cc’d on them.

            • ealoe@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yes and no; technically they’re an independent entity but they’ve been used as useful idiots by Russian intelligence so many times at this point they’re effectively Russian

            • SLfgb@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              nope.

            • BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              22
              ·
              10 months ago

              No, the whole “Wikileaks is a Russian asset” story is a farce used to unjustly discredit them, since they’ve published some extremely damning documents.

              • Bananigans@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                25
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                It might be because RT gave Assange his talk show on state run tv, RT claimed WikiLeaks as a partner, Assange dumped the 2016 emails after Trump’s “Russia if your listening” statement, or because after Assange claimed the hacker that provided WikiLeaks with those 2016 emails wasn’t Russian, he was.

                If you step back and squint, it kind of looks like he was working with Russia because of all the work with Russia.

                • SLfgb@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Assange’s show was produced independently and then licensed to RT, among other broadcasters.

                  The show is produced by Quick Roll Productions, which was established by Julian Assange with the assistance of Dartmouth Films. It is distributed by Journeyman Pictures[18] and broadcast internationally in English, Arabic, and Spanish by RT and Italian newspaper L’espresso, who both make the program available online.[1][19][20] The theme for the show was composed by M.I.A.[3][4]

              • TheFriar@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                I mean, that’s not entirely true. Yeah, there has been a long history of US based organizations, particularly governmental ones, trying to stop Wikileaks, capture Snowden, and generally just punish whistleblowers so brutally is deters anyone else from doing it.

                But that doesn’t mean that as the years went on, the mission of Wikileaks changed as they seemed to adopt a particular goal that wasn’t just “shining a light on corruption.”

                So it’s not as simple as “it’s a Russian asset” and it’s not as simple as “they’re being smeared for spilling govt secrets.” It’s a mixture of the two, but not only, and not entirely.

                • SLfgb@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  You’re right, it does not mean the mission of WikiLeaks changed. It clearly hasn’t. They still have never had to retract a single document or story.

                  • TheFriar@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    But weren’t some of the Clinton email leaks proven to be planted?

              • SLfgb@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                Totally. It is a complete farce.

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            Cuz they would have sat on it

          • BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            10 months ago

            Because they would actually publish it.

            • AnomalousBit@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Narrator: They would not

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                As opposed to the current recipients, who are sitting on it.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      But I thought it was Iran that hacked Trump. Surely they have media that can make this info available.

      No, that makes sense. They have the time and energy to hack the Trump campaign email servers. But somehow lack the ability to make that information public. Yeah, that makes much more sense.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        deleted by creator

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Or because there is literally nothing worth reporting. I guarantee if there was some juicy stories, they would come out.

People Twitter@sh.itjust.works

whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it’s a major figure or a politician.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 585 users / day
  • 5.1K users / week
  • 9.93K users / month
  • 19.8K users / 6 months
  • 60 local subscribers
  • 7.38K subscribers
  • 1.25K Posts
  • 61.9K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    cake
  • BE: 0.19.8
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org