Flying Squid@lemmy.world to InsanePeopleFacebook@lemmy.world · 11 months agoWhat goes up must… stay there?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up1114arrow-down13
arrow-up1111arrow-down1imageWhat goes up must… stay there?lemmy.worldFlying Squid@lemmy.world to InsanePeopleFacebook@lemmy.world · 11 months agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-squaresome_guylinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·11 months agoI think we’re beyond speculation. It seems pretty solid to me that burning metals on re-entry will release harmful chemicals. Why it hadn’t been proposed before, I suppose just because it wasn’t happening on such a gargantuan scale. Fuck Lonnie.
minus-squareTonyTonyChopper@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-211 months agoI doubt the mass of satellites is in any way comparable to the normal influx of meteors. > An estimated 25 million meteoroids, micrometeoroids and other space debris enter Earth’s atmosphere each day,[9] which results in an estimated 15,000 tonnes of that material entering the atmosphere each year. So 250 vs 15,000 tons per year, round up and it’s 2%. Another estimate said 40,000 tons. Satellites are definitely not a significant influence.
I think we’re beyond speculation. It seems pretty solid to me that burning metals on re-entry will release harmful chemicals. Why it hadn’t been proposed before, I suppose just because it wasn’t happening on such a gargantuan scale. Fuck Lonnie.
I doubt the mass of satellites is in any way comparable to the normal influx of meteors.
> An estimated 25 million meteoroids, micrometeoroids and other space debris enter Earth’s atmosphere each day,[9] which results in an estimated 15,000 tonnes of that material entering the atmosphere each year.
So 250 vs 15,000 tons per year, round up and it’s 2%. Another estimate said 40,000 tons. Satellites are definitely not a significant influence.