SDF Chatter
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
OutrageousHairdo [he/him]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year ago

Fascism and Falsifying Science, Name a more Iconic Duo

hexbear.net

message-square
11
fedilink
117

Fascism and Falsifying Science, Name a more Iconic Duo

hexbear.net

OutrageousHairdo [he/him]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
11
fedilink
  • ButtBidet [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 year ago

    I need to scream over and over. The Cass Review is not peer reviewed. Scientifically, it’s a blog paid for by NHS.

    • TheDoctor [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s had several peer reviewed rebuttals that are damning, however.

      • BodyBySisyphus [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Any chance you have some links handy? I just had an argument with my brother about this issue but didn’t have any sources.

        • windowlicker [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          this critique points out the numerous methodological flaws in the report.

          • ButtBidet [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            order-of-lenin

          • BodyBySisyphus [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            heart-sickle Thank you very much!

    • radiofreeval [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      How often do meta analyses get peer review? I was under the impression that it is relatively common for meta analyses to not be peer reviewed because no new studies are being conducted.

      • ButtBidet [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Feck my effort comment didn’t post.

        Tldr: meta analysis get peer reviewed like any sort of study.

chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don’t post low-hanging fruit here.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 938 users / day
  • 1.49K users / week
  • 2.67K users / month
  • 5.31K users / 6 months
  • 30 local subscribers
  • 13.9K subscribers
  • 20.8K Posts
  • 307K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA [he/him]@hexbear.net
  • MiraculousMM [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
  • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
  • corgiwithalaptop [any, love/loves]@hexbear.net
  • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
  • ZoomeristLeninist [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
  • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
  • sweet_pecan [love/loves, they/them]@hexbear.net
  • a_little_red_rat [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
  • khizuo [ze/zir]@hexbear.net
  • gaystyleJoker [she/her]@hexbear.net
  • thelastaxolotl [he/him]@hexbear.net
  • context [fae/faer, fae/faer]@hexbear.net
  • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
  • Sulvy [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
  • BE: 0.19.8
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org