The first article is about the ceasefire proposal. It has not stopped the flow of weapons, and Biden still will not call it the genocide it is.
The second article is an opinion piece that speculates that Biden is losing patience with Netanyahu, which we’ve heard before without any alteration to US policy.
You won’t even admit that Biden is supporting genocide.
https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/06/1150886
https://news.sky.com/story/biden-has-run-out-of-patience-with-netanyahu-and-what-might-be-coordinated-move-on-gaza-might-just-work-13146307
What’s your spin here?
The first article is about the ceasefire proposal. It has not stopped the flow of weapons, and Biden still will not call it the genocide it is.
The second article is an opinion piece that speculates that Biden is losing patience with Netanyahu, which we’ve heard before without any alteration to US policy.
Any other blatantly false points you’d like to blindly grasp at?
No? Just repeating the same blatantly false points over and over again in the hope that someone will believe them? Cool. We’re done here.
It’s not false that Biden is supporting genocide. It’s also not false that you refuse to admit it.