SDF Chatter
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
silence7@slrpnk.net to United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml · 2 years ago

Climate Is Now a US Culture War Issue

www.nytimes.com

external-link
message-square
52
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • politics@beehaw.org
  • climate@slrpnk.net
178
external-link

Climate Is Now a US Culture War Issue

www.nytimes.com

silence7@slrpnk.net to United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml · 2 years ago
message-square
52
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • politics@beehaw.org
  • climate@slrpnk.net
Opinion | Climate Is Now a Culture War Issue
www.nytimes.com
external-link
And it couldn’t have happened at a worse time.
  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    While conservatives outright reject that the climate crisis is happening, liberals tend to acknowledge it and simply pay lip service without putting any serious effort into dealing with the problem. US has made no meaningful progress in transitioning off fossil fuels so far, and continues to subsidize and expand fossil fuel projects under the democrats. There is no serious plan that’s being implemented, and projects that do exist often amount to greenwashing.

    We can see what a serious plan looks like by looking at China where majority of renewables are now produced and capacity is growing at an accelerating rate each year. China is also leading in nuclear power and building 150 new reactors now.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      The US has actually cut its greenhouse gas emissions somewhat:

      Graph of US greenhouse gas emissions by economic sector, 1990-2021.  Shows emissions rising until ~2006, and dropping thereafter, mostly due to electric generation emissions cuts

      A few states have a lot of renewables in their electric supply mix. Here’s California right now: Chart showing California's electric supply at one particular instant.  57% renewables.  6% nuclear.  5% large-scalae hydroelectic

      It’s not enough to stabilize temperatures; that means actually getting to zero emissions worldwide, but it’s a start.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s important to keep in mind that US has moved out much of its manufacturing hen looking at these charts. To get the full picture we have to look at the global emissions produced when manufacturing goods and services people in US consume.

        And then it’s instructive to put the gains US made into perspective of what China managed to do. This is a great overview of the progress just this year alone https://nitter.net/KyleTrainEmoji/status/1680243524124516352

        Fossil fuels now account for less than half of China’s power capacity https://e360.yale.edu/digest/china-zero-carbon-electricity

        China is also doing huge amount of carbon capture via reforestation https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-54714692

        and it’s now the global leader in renewable energy by a huge margin https://www.csis.org/east-green-chinas-global-leadership-renewable-energy

        How is it that China is able to do these things while US cannot?

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Basically, China had a bunch of industrial policy around capturing the solar manufacturing, and a willingness to use slave labor to undercut prices in the rest of the world.

          It’s worth nothing that trade doesn’t make a huge difference to emissions.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 years ago

            That’s a really dishonest framing of China’s policies given that it’s the one place in the world where wages are actually going up and poverty is being eliminated:

            If we take just one country, China, out of the global poverty equation, then even under the $1.90 poverty standard we find that the extreme poverty headcount is the exact same as it was in 1981.

            The $1.90/day (2011 PPP) line is not an adequate or in any way satisfactory level of consumption; it is explicitly an extreme measure. Some analysts suggest that around $7.40/day is the minimum necessary to achieve good nutrition and normal life expectancy, while others propose we use the US poverty line, which is $15.

            Labor in China is far from being cheapest in the world today, so your whole narrative here is based on a false premise.

            What China had the willingness to do was to create a concrete plan to move off fossil fuels and then commit to implementing it long term.

            Meanwhile, the relative difference is pretty significant:

            For example, the USA has a value of 7.7% meaning its net import of CO2 is equivalent to 7.7% of its domestic emissions. This means emissions calculated on the basis of ‘consumption’ are 7.7% higher than their emissions based on production.

            For example, China’s value of -14% means its net export of CO2 is equivalent to 14% of its domestic emissions. The consumption-based emissions of China are 14% lower than their production-based emissions.

            And then we have to look at this in the context of per capita emissions which is even worse https://ourworldindata.org/co2/country/united-states?country=USA~CHN

            The key part in all this is that China is transitioning off fossil fuels while US keeps talking about it, while having done little tangible work in this regard.

            • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              They’re specifically using forced labor from Uyghurs for solar manufacturing. It’s a problem, and one that’s complicating the ability of China to export solar panels.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                2 years ago

                There’s no actual evidence for this claim. If you want to see actual forced labour then look at US prison system. US has the highest incarceration rate in the world and prisoners are used as literal slave labour. Meanwhile, the smear by US regime is also having very little actual impact on China’s ability to export solar panels.

                • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  If it’s not real, China can open up the region to outsiders, and let workers communicate freely without monitors present or spyware on their phones.

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    China has opened up the region to outsiders plenty of people have visited it including western news agencies. Here’s one example. You’re just regurgitating propaganda your regime is feeding you, there is no evidence for it. Meanwhile, we have lots of concrete evidence for precisely the sorts of atrocities US accuses China of happening in US. Maybe focus on what’s happening in your own country.

United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml

usa@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !usa@lemmy.ml
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 260 users / day
  • 1.27K users / week
  • 2.36K users / month
  • 9.78K users / 6 months
  • 97 local subscribers
  • 8.03K subscribers
  • 7.23K Posts
  • 42.2K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • pangyuehung@lemmy.ml
  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.8
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org