defunct_punk@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1年前Cumlemmy.worldimagemessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1395arrow-down124
arrow-up1371arrow-down1imageCumlemmy.worlddefunct_punk@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1年前message-square30fedilink
minus-squareCTDummy@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1年前I though it was post hoc, ergo propter hoc? After the fact, therefore because of the fact?
minus-squarenahuse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·edit-21年前Yeah, that’s what I mean. The person I was responding to was comparing it to cum hoc which means that the two events being considered simultaneously, which I don’t think is correct.
I though it was post hoc, ergo propter hoc? After the fact, therefore because of the fact?
Yeah, that’s what I mean.
The person I was responding to was comparing it to cum hoc which means that the two events being considered simultaneously, which I don’t think is correct.
deleted by creator