Rainb0wSkeppy@lemmy.world to Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year agoYOU HAVE BEEN LIED TO THIS WHOLE TIME!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up185arrow-down10
arrow-up185arrow-down1imageYOU HAVE BEEN LIED TO THIS WHOLE TIME!lemmy.worldRainb0wSkeppy@lemmy.world to Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-squaresouthsamurai@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up47·1 year agoSadly, this is so far over my head that I have to accept it as truth, spread the word with authority, and found a religion based on it
minus-squareCatt@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up55·edit-21 year agoThis “proof” is based on a bug in Casio calculators (tested it on the fx-991EX classwitz, got it there too) A try to explain it is in this video by Matt Parker. Are exactly the same numbers
minus-squarepearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·1 year agoIt’s just an equation that gives you the first few digits of pi if you treat pi as a variable. But, pi isn’t a variable, so it’s not a real equation.
minus-squarepearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year ago pi is being treated as if it’s some value that it’s not in the first equation That’s a variable. The value of ‘pi’ is dependent on the rest of the equation. If you treat it as a variable, the math gives you 3.1415926536.
minus-squaresouthsamurai@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoAhhh, gotcha! Thanks for the info :)
minus-squaredm_me_your_boobs@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoAs a programmer, I know what a variable is. Therefore, now this all makes sense to me.
minus-squareDerisionConsulting@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·1 year agoMaybe I am also too dumb, but isn’t the issue that the first equation is just wrong? It assumes that pi only equals 3.141592654
Sadly, this is so far over my head that I have to accept it as truth, spread the word with authority, and found a religion based on it
This “proof” is based on a bug in Casio calculators (tested it on the fx-991EX classwitz, got it there too)
A try to explain it is in this video by Matt Parker. Are exactly the same numbers
It’s not a bug, it’s a feature
It’s just an equation that gives you the first few digits of pi if you treat pi as a variable.
But, pi isn’t a variable, so it’s not a real equation.
deleted by creator
That’s a variable. The value of ‘pi’ is dependent on the rest of the equation.
If you treat it as a variable, the math gives you 3.1415926536.
Ahhh, gotcha! Thanks for the info :)
As a programmer, I know what a variable is. Therefore, now this all makes sense to me.
Maybe I am also too dumb, but isn’t the issue that the first equation is just wrong? It assumes that pi only equals 3.141592654