Like A Duck@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 years agoAre you a 10?programming.devimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1437arrow-down131
arrow-up1406arrow-down1imageAre you a 10?programming.devLike A Duck@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 years agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareMxM111@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoIf you are using only binary, then you are 10/11.
minus-squareFilthyShrooms@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoI did that because in coding, you start counting at zero, so 00=0, 01=1, 10=2, and 11=3. Therefore, if I’m a 10 out of 11, then I’d be a 2 out of 3. However, there are 4 options total, so saying 3/4, or 75% is more accurate.
If you are using only binary, then you are 10/11.
2/3? why? that’s strangely arbitrary…
I did that because in coding, you start counting at zero, so 00=0, 01=1, 10=2, and 11=3. Therefore, if I’m a 10 out of 11, then I’d be a 2 out of 3. However, there are 4 options total, so saying 3/4, or 75% is more accurate.
Still better than 10 / 99