SDF Chatter
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
engineer [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year ago

Tucson Teacher Fired, You'll never guess who

lock

hexbear.net

message-square
159
fedilink
112

Tucson Teacher Fired, You'll never guess who

lock

hexbear.net

engineer [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
159
fedilink
  • Carguacountii [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Removed by mod

    • Sphere [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      So, writing anything that multiple people misunderstand and find offensive, especially if it can be called ‘controversial,’ is an automatic disqualification from teaching, got it. Makes perfect sense, and I’m not at all deeply disappointed to see multiple hexbears upvote this horrifically bad take.

      • AOCapitulator [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am absolutely fucking disgusted with this shit

      • Carguacountii [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not anything, but certainly something about child abuse, when, and I can’t emphasise this enough, you’re responsible for teaching children is certainly an auto disqualification.

        • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          So if someone says “child abuse is bad” they should be banned from teaching, because they said something about child abuse, do I have this right?

          • Carguacountii [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Removed by mod

            • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Once again, Lolita is not a fantasy about child abuse. Please read the book.

              • Carguacountii [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Removed by mod

                • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  ‘Fantasy’ implies it was written as an erotic novel, rather than a critique of child abuse. The narrative makes it very clear that the protagonist is a monster and that everything he did was horrible. For the last time please read the book and educate yourself about it before passing judgement, because banning a book you haven’t read but you think is pornographic despite everyone telling you otherwise makes you indistinguishable from the GOP freaks who are banning every book from school libraries that so much as acknowledges the existence of LGBTQ+ people.

                  • Carguacountii [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Removed by mod

chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don’t post low-hanging fruit here.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 753 users / day
  • 1.69K users / week
  • 2.64K users / month
  • 5.26K users / 6 months
  • 30 local subscribers
  • 13.8K subscribers
  • 20.5K Posts
  • 303K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA [he/him]@hexbear.net
  • MiraculousMM [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
  • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
  • corgiwithalaptop [any, love/loves]@hexbear.net
  • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
  • ZoomeristLeninist [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
  • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
  • sweet_pecan [love/loves, they/them]@hexbear.net
  • a_little_red_rat [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
  • khizuo [ze/zir]@hexbear.net
  • gaystyleJoker [she/her]@hexbear.net
  • thelastaxolotl [he/him]@hexbear.net
  • context [fae/faer, fae/faer]@hexbear.net
  • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
  • Sulvy [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
  • BE: 0.19.8
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org