mistrgamin@lemmy.world to pissposting@lemmy.world · 1 year agoframe postinglemmy.worldimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1520arrow-down110
arrow-up1510arrow-down1imageframe postinglemmy.worldmistrgamin@lemmy.world to pissposting@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squareabbotsbury@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down2·1 year agoStrong disagree, the smoothness afforded by high frame rates will make any game where you directly control the camera feel much better to play.
minus-squaremoshtradamus666@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down10·1 year agoSo I guess you would miss because you had it. Basically what I said.
minus-squareabbotsbury@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down1·1 year agoAnyone playing an older game can have it. I used to think Half Life 2 was special because it just felt better to play, more responsive and fluid, but it turns out it’s just a well optimized game with a framerate cap of 300.
minus-squaremoshtradamus666@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·1 year agoDid you have a 300hz monitor back then?
minus-squareabbotsbury@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·1 year agoI did not, but decreased frame time is still noticeable on refresh rates lower than frame rate. Video with some more information and a useful graphic
Strong disagree, the smoothness afforded by high frame rates will make any game where you directly control the camera feel much better to play.
So I guess you would miss because you had it. Basically what I said.
Anyone playing an older game can have it. I used to think Half Life 2 was special because it just felt better to play, more responsive and fluid, but it turns out it’s just a well optimized game with a framerate cap of 300.
Did you have a 300hz monitor back then?
I did not, but decreased frame time is still noticeable on refresh rates lower than frame rate.
Video with some more information and a useful graphic
Good video